Uncategorized

Perry’s in-state tuition Works for Texas

by Katie Thompson, Chairman of College Republicans at St. Edwards

Have you heard? “The government is subsidizing illegal immigration! The Texas DREAM Act grants amnesty! Illegal immigrants are going to college for FREE!”

Hold your horses, folks. These statements, which are hurled at Gov. Rick Perry from both sides of the political spectrum, are simply not true.

In-state tuition for illegal immigrants is a hard policy to argue because it rests on such a thin line between supporting education and rewarding law-breaking. Admittedly, the governor didn’t argue the case well when he said opponents of this policy “don’t have a heart.” (He’s since recanted that statement.) But the people of Texas and the law support it and, when you know the truth, the policy is really not as controversial as it sounds.

Let’s start with the facts.

Those officially qualified as residents of the state of Texas are eligible for reduced in-state tuition rates at public universities. Resident status, as defined by the Texas Education Code §54.052 and §54.053, requires the following:

  • Citizens must have lived in Texas for a minimum of three years and have graduated from a Texas high school.
  • Non-citizens must have lived in Texas for a minimum of three years, have graduated from a Texas high school, and commit to starting the process of obtaining legal citizenship.

It’s that simple.

Critics say it’s a policy Texans don’t support. But it was overwhelmingly passed by the state legislature in 2001 with just five dissenting votes out of the 181 members in both houses. If that isn’t a majority, and a bipartisan one at that, I don’t know what is.

Other skeptics say it creates an unmanageable drain in tuition dollars and costs taxpayers millions. But in the 2010 fiscal year, only about 16,476 students out of 1.3 million, most at two-year community colleges, took the reduced rates. That’s about one percent – hardly a takeover of the public education system. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board estimated that, “assuming many of these students would enroll in less expensive schools or drop out altogether if faced with higher tuition costs,” the state would actually lose almost $92 million if the policy were repealed.

Still others say it’s the equivalent of amnesty. This is the one point that makes my internal alarm begin to chirp. I do not and will never condone illegal immigration or amnesty for illegal immigrants in any form – but the fact is, many of these students were brought to the U.S. by their parents. They are committing themselves to furthering their education, making a better life for themselves, and becoming productive citizens. This policy makes the best of a bad situation.

In the words of Geoffrey Tahuahua, Texas state chair of Students for Rick Perry, “Rather than allowing these kids to be a burden on the system, it’s better to encourage them to become educated contributors to our economy and our society.”

And Texas is not the only state to offer in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. According to CNN, California, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin have similar policies (though Wisconsin’s may be set to expire this year).

Bottom line, in-state tuition facilitates the education of young people and commits them to obtaining citizenship. That’s the crucial piece of the puzzle.

Finally, in-state tuition is just that: a state issue. Not once has Governor Perry advocated for the federal government or other states to adopt this policy. He has yet to indicate that he would do so as President. The fact is, this policy is legal, and it has no real negative consequences.  Until the border is actually secured, I can see no reason to repeal this law.

You may not like it, but it works for Texas. And as y’all know, it’s never a good idea to mess with Texas.

Katie is a senior English Writing and Rhetoric major at St. Edward’s University. She is also a member of Students for Rick Perry

About these ads

Discussion

7 thoughts on “Perry’s in-state tuition Works for Texas

  1. Interesting take on it being a state issue–as I am aware–Romneycare was state.. and not federal–but people will still demonize that–AND He never advocated a federal takeover. I love how you are giving dibs to Romney on this one, maybe you should tell Gov Perry to remember that. 10th Amendment right?

    Posted by Colt Ables | October 26, 2011, 9:28 am
    • Ah, but the difference is Mr. Romney said he’d like Romneycare to be implemented outside Massachusetts. To my knowledge, Perry has never done so for in-state tuition.

      Posted by Katie Thompson (@TexasGrizzlette) | October 26, 2011, 12:24 pm
      • Massachusetts citizens favor Romneycare just as Texans favor the in-state tuition policy. Romneycare is a states issue and the Governor has stated numerous times he would not be in favor of taking a similar model federally, regardless of any out-of-context news clippings you might cite.

        Posted by David Blanch | October 26, 2011, 3:57 pm
  2. The most important thing about this, which you missed, is that Illegals actually PAY for state schools. While most states subsidize their higher education with income taxes, Texas has no income tax and does so through SALES tax, a tax that illegals actually pay.

    Posted by JT | October 30, 2011, 6:47 pm
  3. I don’t live in Texas, but I know there is no state income tax. Illegals, like them or not, pay Texas sales taxes like everyone else that lives in Texas though.

    No matter how many times this mantra is repeated, it never ceases being a spurious argument. The sales taxes paid by illegal aliens are not commensurate with the value of public services they consume. Primarily, but not exclusively, in the form of free K-12 education-and heavily subsidized college education-and access to free health care.

    Furthermore, a large portion of their income, which is used for remittances to family members living abroad, escapes any tax whatsoever. Add on taxpayer-subsidized public housing, food stamps, and the welter of benefits that their American-born children receive and you are courting fiscal insolvency. Just ask Los Angeles County.

    Posted by Gerard | November 6, 2011, 10:05 pm
  4. The fact that it was overwhelmingly enacted by the legislature does not signify widespread public support. The New York City Council and our state’s current governor have repeatedly vitiated agreements with federal immigration authorities simply to pander to illegal aliens and the large section of the Democratic Party that cultivates that group as a future voting bloc. The majority of citizens in New York State support enforcing immigration laws, yet their viewpoint is disregarded simply because our public officials feel the need to cater to a politically influential special interest group.

    Posted by Gerard | November 6, 2011, 10:08 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Perry’s in-state tuition works for Texas » Texas Grizzlette - October 26, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

This Site is Sponsored By:

Empower Texans

Young Conservatives of Texas

Texas College Republicans

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: